Ok, no more lan party. They suddenly felt the urge to change it from 6-11pm instead. Great. Factor all the complications with transport and where I live... No thanks, I'll pass. Noobs. Now I just have to drag my sorry self up to take an hour long train ride to go prepare for a debate that I won't be participating in, followed by an equally long ride home, all in the same afternoon. -Enthusiasm-

Spent about 5 hours straight doing chem today. Stupid teacher made us learn equilibrium by ourselves. She fails to understand that revision is probably the most effective thing to occupy our holiday with, if anything at all, rather than trying to make us self-learn a new topic, which would probably be the last thing on our minds once school reopens. Whereupon she will inevitably be forced to teach us the entire topic again, voiding the vain effort that students put into learning the topic in the first place and making everyone feel stupid. Holidays obviously aren't the best time to force what will probably become pointless rote learning, an idea which teachers either evidently have a problem with grasping, or one that they just refuse to grasp. Yes I'm fscking pissed.

At least that's chem out of the window. /spit. I'm not done yet.

What is the deal with parents and illogical, ridiculous demands?
Cliché as this sounds, I have found this to be true time and time again. I attempt to avoid specific examples in venting my frustration. Some things in this world don't belong in some places, and in many cases this is blatantly obvious to people in general. This is due to the fact that inconvenience follows when two objects without the appropriate synergy are in conflict, generally to the people interacting with these objects. It then follows, as is the case with human nature, that people will start to wonder why it is that they suffer such inconveniences. Is it possible that suffering such inconvenience is unnecessary? Can these objects perhaps be placed in a different way, such that inconvenience is avoided? Is there a way around it? If positive responses to these questions exist, is it not logical that the next fscking step of action to be taken would be the removal of the inconvenience through modification of the elements involved?

Along comes mum. While raving at the top of her lungs, she raucously demands that the objects be returned back to their original position, contrary to reason itself. Wtf. As any other reasoning being would, you ask why, right? Wrong. Bad idea. Her anger flares to ten times of its previous ferocity, while she manages to completely avoid the question in the process. Which begs the question: why the fsck do you persist in your irrational stipulations, when someone has kindly made it very obvious why they are such? She continues gibbering in a frenzied state while trying to make me understand why I must endure the inconvenience for ~non-existent reason~. I still struggle with understanding my parents sometimes. It's clear I still don't comprehend them. Perhaps I never will.

Good night, noobs.